The Iranian Threat – Myth and Reality

There’s an overwhelming sense of deja vu when following the latest developments in the so-called “Iranian threat” – many of the usual players are present, from Scott Ritter, the weapons inspector who gave the all clear over Saddam’s alleged weapons program (and was roundly ignored) to John Bolton, arch-hawk neocon warmonger who makes regular appearances on mainstream American TV calling for military action against Iran, as well as the ubiquitous, traditional supporting cast of nameless, faceless “intelligence experts” and “Israeli sources” doling out the propaganda and fabrications for the drones in the mainstream media to repeat to the public. Yes, once again we’re manufacturing consent for another military strike against a Middle Eastern country with large deposits of energy reserves, who refuses to play ball, roll over and acquiesce to Western imperialism.

The Daily Express claimed recently that Saudi Arabia is “ready to allow Israel to bomb Iran’s new nuclear site,” citing a meeting between MI6 Chief Sir John Scarlett and Mossad Chief Meir Dagan. The new site, reportedly near the city of Qom and situated under a mountain, was revealed by Iran to be in construction in late September, to much furore in the mainstream media – outrage and indignation filling copious pages of copy – despite the fact that the site doesn’t contravene Iran’s obligations to the UN or the IAEA, who maintain that there is no proof that Iran has a nuclear weapons program (Iran was obliged under the terms of the IAEA inspections to inform the UN of the new site, which they duly did). Indeed, full plans for a pre-emptive tactical nuclear strike against Iran were drawn up by the Israelis back in 2007, and since then the level of bellicose rhetoric coming from Israel’s hardliners has barely abated, echoed by many right-wingers in the US political establishment. Since Iran’s announcement of the new facility, Brown, Sarkozy and Obama have all called for “crippling” sanctions; Obama’s declaration that “Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow” has no basis in legality – Iran has acted well within accordance to its obligations under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty – and is tempered by a not insignificant dose of hypocrisy, given the US’s unilateral and illegal bombing of Pakistan, to name but one of a litany of violations of international law.

Anti-Iranian propaganda has consistently featured in the mainstream media for several years now. It reached something of a zenith during the elections in July, when uncorroborated, circumstantial evidence was lauded as “proof” of Iranian political corruption. Much of this propaganda was based on the declarations of Ahmedinejad’s political rival, Mousavi, who announced his victory before the vote count was completed, then charged his opponent with fraud without providing one jot of evidence. But facts and evidence are not prerequisites for propaganda in the Western media (a perusal of Guardian writer Simon Tisdall’s articles is enough to demonstrate as much), and the campaign to denigrate the election results went immediately into full swing.

If Western leaders demonstrate barefaced hypocrisy when it comes to demanding Iran adhere to international law, so too the media’s hypocrisy over the so-called “democractic deficit” of the Iranian elections comes to the fore – this is the same media, after all, who failed to cover serious election fraud in the US during both the 2000 and 2004 election campaigns, who praised to the hilt the sham elections held in occupation Iraq in 2005, and who roundly ignored the serious damage inflicted on democracy in Honduras when President Zelaya was ousted in a military coup, at the same time the Iranian elections were being held. The audacious double standards of the Western press never ceases to amaze. Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that the unrest following the Iranian election may have been, at least in part, a consequence of American psyops – Bush announced a budget of $400 million for political “destabilisation” in Iran back in 2005, in a program which included the use of terrorist groups, and the unrest bore many similarities to the US-backed, foundation-orchestrated “colour” revolutions witnessed in former Soviet bloc countries in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

So the propaganda continues. Ahmadinejad’s “wipe Israel off the map” mistranslation will continue to do the rounds, demonising language will litter the pages of the establishment media, and efforts to engage in rational thinking will be subsumed beneath a torrent of emotive yet baseless accusations and speculation. Just another day in the “liberal democratic” West…

Advertisements

11 responses to “The Iranian Threat – Myth and Reality

  1. Anyone recall the Egyptian Presidential election 2005 and how fair and free it was with the banning of any candidate who posed a challenge to the military dictator Mubarak. Mubarak received 88% of the vote.

    Were there any protests of way the elction was held and its rigging?

    What about some of the other dictators such as Zine El Abidine Ben Ali of Tunisia who managed to received 94% of the vote?

    Wanting Democracy for the Iranian people is a smokescreen for targetting their natural resources (Oil) for plunder.

  2. Excellent article, maybe the powers that be think that instigating a large scale conflict will be a means to which they can get out of the current recession?

    Of course Iran is already going through its own process of gradual moderation and left to its own devices will eventually become a moderate peaceful state.

    Of course there current political and religious difficulties are on record to have been caused by the CIA who when the Iranians threatened to strike an oil deal with Russia instigated a revolution and deposed the sha.

    The Iranians are also a very intelligent people and even if they weren’t conservatively 10 years from an effective nuclear device they would be extremely foolish to ever use one. Its not only the problem of building and maintaining an effective nuclear device which is an enormously costly and technical exercise but the development of an effective delivery system is also just as costly.
    Dont believe the mainstream Media hype showing Iran test firing missiles and talking of uranium. To make an effective device that can be made small enough to fit on a missile and a missile with an effective range and accuracy are two enormous tasks which experts think Iran is at least 10 years away from. Nuclear weapons are not to be confused with nuclear energy. The weapons require a great deal of expertise.

    The mainstream media just makes broad statements with little scientific detail and expects the public to make the assumption that Iran is about to fire nuclear missiles at london. Yet more lies and spin, surely the public wont fall for it again? once bitten and all that.

    Excellent article, keep them coming.

  3. Scott Ritter on Democracy Now

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/9/29/fmr_un_weapons_inspector_scott_ritter

    also on the same show the latest from Honduras.

    • Thanks for this – shall give it a watch now. Notice how quiet the media are regarding Honduras – and the G20 protests/police violence in Pittsburgh, about which I’ve not seen a single article in the British press…

  4. Excellent analysis Orwell. It’s the kind of article I would love to see published in the Guardian and other papers instead of the junk that we are being served.

    I am sick and tired of being endlessly drip fed anti-Iranian and pro-war propaganda.

  5. Below is a picture of a ‘sonic gun’ directed at the Brazilian embassy in Honduras.

    http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/3460/honduran-coup-regime-mocks-un-security-council-embassy-attacks

    And here is a youtube video of a ‘sonic gun’ in action in Pittsburgh, G20 protests.

    doesn’t the commanding voice remind you of Robocop?

    • Completely depersonalised – along with the police… I can see things getting much worse over in the States before they get any better…

  6. Sorry, didn’t mean for the Robocop vid to appear in my comment.

    Here the propaganda continues thanks to AP.

    “US: No `snap judgment’ this week on Iran nukes”

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gMWnTNi2WvELwNz8MqRXYBYmK9dQD9B168JG0

    wonder who writes the headlines?

    • One thing the propaganda does so effectively is cloud the fact that the Iranians are doing nothing wrong – well within their rights under the NPT to develop nuclear energy resources, which is the only thing there’s any proof of them doing. Insane world – mass murderers lecturing a nation which hasn’t declared war in living memory on their energy needs. Being dressed up as villains by villains…

  7. I don’t know If I said it already but …Cool site, love the info. I do a lot of research online on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks, 🙂

    A definite great read..Jim Bean

  8. Great stuff.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s